Archive > Survivor 11: Guatemala

Reality for Canadians

<< < (3/3)

Mandoli:
If it means rooting for the underdog, I'll root for Canadians. (That means they'll be the first one axed. Always happens to my personal favorites. And it sucks, too! :()

RudyRules:

--- Quote from: ruperts butcrack on October 13, 2005, 09:04:06 AM ---they should have an all canadian survivor,it would only be one show,they would all quit before the show finished.gary coleman could host

--- End quote ---
((^ ((^ You crack (no pun) me up, ruperts butcrack!  ^/^  Love your username!
Tanks for your great sense of humor!  {l{
(humour? I have a Canadian friend who spells it like that.) But like puddin says, spelling doesn't matter here!  I'm a good speller, but do use lotsa shortcuts for posting & emails.  Like enuf, probly, lotsa,  B:) B:)

Car84:
If Survivor was held in the United States somewhere (Survivor - Maui?), that would make the winner - wherever he or she is from - subject to United States income tax.  Income earned in the U.S. by non-residents is included in taxable income on Form 1040-NR.

I'm wondering why it would really matter to the powers-that-be at Survivor.  They're not obligated to have a U.S.-taxable winner, after all.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page