There is just no pleasing the majority of you. <_<
First Natalie says "Maybe we should get Sharon out", everyone freaks out "ITS CAUSE OF MATT" "NATALIE IS SO STUPID" and then she decides "Hey, we'll take out Josh" and now everyones like ":@ NATALIE HOW COULD YOU?"
Look. She's playing an important game. She can't screw this up, I don't think she cares that you're angry because she blamed something on someone else to get further in the game. This game is about lying. The only time lying ever makes me mad is when they proclaim their word is better in DRs, to their allies and generally all the time(James) and then go back on it. She's a liar, so what? I'm sure you people would pass the blame on someone else to get a step closer to $500, 000. ![:P](https://forum.realityfanforum.com/Smileys/classic/untitled.bmp)
Excuse me, but I was upset/angry over her making a stupid choice to send Sharon out, it will affect her game. Im sorry but it WILL. And just because im a fan of Sharon is not why I am saying that. I do like Sharon and will miss her (just like I still miss Alex) but I do think Natalie is dumb, why should she even put up Sharon and risk it. She told her the plan, obviously she doesn't want her out. So put up Ryan. Shes making a dumb mistake.
So I believe I can be angry, thats my opinion. Just like you have yours. I hate how Natalie preaches the bible, and then does what she does. Don't bring God into a game like this. Thats the problem I have.
If its not BECAUSE OF MATT - then why didn't she want to send Chelsia to sequester minutes after Chelsia telling her that her and Matt made out and Matt
??
?? her? Why did she want to send James as a bday present?
My point is, I am a fan of Sharon. Point fingers all you want. One of my closest friends on this board is a fan of Josh (actually a few of them are) and either way we lose in my eyes. Because they don't want Josh to leave just as much as I don't want Sharon to leave.
With that said, im out of this I will not say any more about Natalie.
1. That wasn't even directed at you. My point was in general direction that she can't please everyone and her goal is to eliminate EVERYONE there. It's 500, 000. She's going to lie. She's going to try to take all those people out eventually. I never said it was a good or bad decision either way, I was just saying that she would never please everyone. That was my point. I wasn't attacking anyone in particular, I wasn't attacking anyone at all. You misunderstood my point. Apologies if I offended you.
2. I never said you couldn't be angry or you couldn't have your opinion, again, I never mentioned anyone at all. Apologies again?
3. Because James just took out her partner, lied directly into her face and she was his main target? The house was divided at that point and James wanted Natalie out more than anyone. Chelsia was third in the physical competition and everyone KNOWS she was a threat. I believe that's more than enough reason to get her out.
4. I never pointed fingers at anyone. Like Sharon. Like Josh. I never said anyone couldn't. I was just saying in a general direction that there is no pleasing everyone no matter what Natalie does and she WILL make these lies and WILL backstab people for half a million. Again, I didn't intend to personally attack anyone and you misconstrued my opinion as a personal attack. Apologies.
I think that's it, sorry for bringing this back but I didn't read it until now and I wanted to clear the air that I wasn't attacking you or anyone else for that matter.