Archive > Big Brother
BB9 ongoing *commentary* #3
sunshine26:
--- Quote from: bhazlewood on March 28, 2008, 11:27:31 PM ---
--- Quote from: sunshine26 on March 28, 2008, 11:11:49 PM ---
--- Quote from: bhazlewood on March 28, 2008, 11:05:51 PM ---I've seen several posts in the last few day along the lines of "so-and-so is SO greedy, it's all about the money" or "all he cares about is the money!"
EVERY ONE OF THESE PEOPLE signed up for this game FOR THE MONEY. Sure, some are also wanting to get their 15 minutes of fame, or they think it will launch them into some kind of psuedo-celebrity status ("Oh look everyone, there's BUNKY!!") But with the possible exception of Jen last year - THEY ALL WANT THE $500,000 MORE THAN ANYTHING ELSE.
The game is DESIGNED to encourage double-dealing, backstabbing, flip-flopping, and lying. So why do we get so angry with someone for doing exactly that? Why do we disparage someone for trying to win the money? If the rules encouraged "nice" behavior then "nice" people would win the game.
--- End quote ---
b/cuz nat sending sharon home is a stupid game move, nothing to do with favorites it is just plain stupid! to keep josh and james together to send a strong player home, that you know is lying, that you know will NOT work with you, sharon will have no one, it is nat's hoh and it is best for her to keep sharon, as in playing smart! sending sharon home is dumb [gameplay] JMO
--- End quote ---
Hi sunshine!
I don't have any problem at all with people getting "mad" at stupid game play. In fact, I agree with you, that sending Sharon home over Josh is a stupid move for Natalie, and I'd rather see Josh stay!
I just don't understand attacking someone who's playing the game to win the money. (That's not directed at you - that's just a general observation.)
--- End quote ---
hi ya! no i didnt think you were pointing that out to me [no worries] i was just saying keeping one's favorites out of the game! what would be a good gameplay, and nat is playing very stupid in the game right now, say if james was hoh and he sent josh home i would think that was a very stupid move also, just pointing out dumb gameplaying, we are cool! no worries i get what you are saying :tup:
MamaTo4boys:
No James saying he doesn't care who stays is the same thing he said when it was between Chelsia/Sharon. But they sent out Chelsia, he tries this reverse thing on them.
jay111890:
--- Quote from: Mama2myboys on March 28, 2008, 11:35:02 PM ---No James saying he doesn't care who stays is the same thing he said when it was between Chelsia/Sharon. But they sent out Chelsia, he tries this reverse thing on them.
--- End quote ---
but they stook with the plan and sent chelsia i think adam will be the voice of reason and convince nat to send josh home. the downfall of joshs plan will be telling nat this plan five days to early this should have been an ED 10 mins before eviction deal where u hand ur life over in order to stay like he did with jameka bc ppl like nat are too easily swayed
MamaTo4boys:
Yeah but wasn't Dick telling Jameka that to make Jessica think she was staying. I think that was a totally different thing but I could be wrong :lol3:
I think the problem is Natalie can't trust James so why would she trust Josh knowing James is his leader. They are just crazy crazy! And they said it over and over - the reason they were put up together? Was because they would take each other down. I don't know, I give up.
sunshine26:
--- Quote from: Mama2myboys on March 28, 2008, 11:35:02 PM ---No James saying he doesn't care who stays is the same thing he said when it was between Chelsia/Sharon. But they sent out Chelsia, he tries this reverse thing on them.
--- End quote ---
oh mama2myboys i hope you are right! and sharon stays , cuz i so want her in the F2!, i really think adam will be the only one that nat will listen to, and i dont think he thinks it is a good ideal to keep josh!..i hope that dumbo sees she is a FOOL if she gets sharon voted out!
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version