Archive > Big Brother
BB9 ongoing *commentary* #3
anotherNCbbfan:
--- Quote from: bhazlewood on March 28, 2008, 11:14:48 PM ---Ok, time for a less "troublemaker" post :)
I believe the basic "rules" of Big Brother need a major overhaul. For example:
Make the HOH position a higher "risk/reward" ratio. I've floated the idea before of the "sudden death" eviction - the HOH nominates ONE person, and either that person OR the HOH is evicted!
Give each Houseguest a one-time Game Veto. The Game Veto could be used for a variety of things - take yourself off the eviction block, take yourself off slop, put someone else ON slop, negate one person's eviction vote, etc. But once it's used, it's GONE!
Anyone else have any ideas how to shake things up?
--- End quote ---
I like that but I think POV needs to be secret. No one ever knows who won it. No one knows if it is used until BB announces it was used. I think that would make for a great drama with blaming each other for having used or held the veto. :snicker:
sunshine26:
--- Quote from: jay111890 on March 28, 2008, 11:14:09 PM ---the whole basis of nat josh and adams decision to evict sharon is that james and joshuah promised to take sheila out next week if either of them win HOH. the problem with that is that sheila is 99 percent not going home next week. the only scenario that sheila goes next week is if ryan wins pov while nat and adam are nommed but that is outlandish. nat is delusional in thinking that j/j will put up sheila wen j/j have said they hate sheila but will drag her to final 4 or 3 bc of her no comp skills. they will see how horrible their move is come next thursday wen j/j ptu up nat and adam and not sheila
this whole lets hand sheila with the vote thing will be meaningless bc personal and strategy are noot the same thing NATALIE!!! sheila in my opinion already is in the FINAL FIVE!!!
and again y is ryan helping josh out so much? josh has never helped ryan i mean never!!! he even evicted him.
can i get feedback to these thoughts please?
--- End quote ---
you are right! hey arent going to put up shelia, nat is a dumbass to believe that, josh or james wins hoh adam and nat are going up, and if one wins veto ryan is going up, and nat is going home, shelia is going to be so pissed off with nat, wow! what alittle B***H NAT is! and i hope nat goes next week! cuz helia is better off without that witch!! really ashame! these girls could have been a good team, but nat has to have those ugly boys ewwwwwwwwwww what a B***H, just today shelia was her best friend only one she can trust blahblah, i now want nat GONE!!!!! and josh why cant he show sharon some respect, why cant they all do that, and just let her know they arent voting for her to stay,its stupid that they dont let the person know! and josh thinks he is getting sharon's vote [i dont think so] i hope shelia wins hoh and send nat to matt for his freaking birthday! he should love that :lol3: nat's has a very big mouth,lol she will tell shelia, we got 5 days sharon will find out!
bhazlewood:
--- Quote from: sunshine26 on March 28, 2008, 11:11:49 PM ---
--- Quote from: bhazlewood on March 28, 2008, 11:05:51 PM ---I've seen several posts in the last few day along the lines of "so-and-so is SO greedy, it's all about the money" or "all he cares about is the money!"
EVERY ONE OF THESE PEOPLE signed up for this game FOR THE MONEY. Sure, some are also wanting to get their 15 minutes of fame, or they think it will launch them into some kind of psuedo-celebrity status ("Oh look everyone, there's BUNKY!!") But with the possible exception of Jen last year - THEY ALL WANT THE $500,000 MORE THAN ANYTHING ELSE.
The game is DESIGNED to encourage double-dealing, backstabbing, flip-flopping, and lying. So why do we get so angry with someone for doing exactly that? Why do we disparage someone for trying to win the money? If the rules encouraged "nice" behavior then "nice" people would win the game.
--- End quote ---
b/cuz nat sending sharon home is a stupid game move, nothing to do with favorites it is just plain stupid! to keep josh and james together to send a strong player home, that you know is lying, that you know will NOT work with you, sharon will have no one, it is nat's hoh and it is best for her to keep sharon, as in playing smart! sending sharon home is dumb [gameplay] JMO
--- End quote ---
Hi sunshine!
I don't have any problem at all with people getting "mad" at stupid game play. In fact, I agree with you, that sending Sharon home over Josh is a stupid move for Natalie, and I'd rather see Josh stay!
I just don't understand attacking someone who's playing the game to win the money. (That's not directed at you - that's just a general observation.)
MamaTo4boys:
If it was me, they were words of just being plain mad. Im over it, Sharon is leaving and im ok with it.
Just hope Natalie gets screwed, and not by Matty :lol3:
jay111890:
for now sharon is staying or it looks that way bc natalie has caught on to joshs lies :wohoo:
this all took place after james said he doent care who goes to natalie and nat said we dont want james to have any freinds in this house and baller said lets stick with the plan
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version