Author Topic: EP7 : Elimination Poll (Read 5901 times)

puddin · « **on:** November 05, 2005, 06:52:10 PM »

You can vote up to 3 blocks . I'm alittle anxious to see what your all thinking .
2 hours 2 legs , all teams accounted for in Arizona so the first leg must be a NEL or possable ToBeCont..extended leg , probably a NEL but I'll leave all options open .

Please place your first to last picks for the 1ST LEG
1st)
2nd)
3rd)
4th)
5th)

Please place your first to last picks for the 2nd LEG .
1st)
2nd)
3rd)
4th)
5th)

supsandalee · « **Reply #1 on:** November 05, 2005, 07:23:08 PM »

I'll probably change my mind between now and Tuesday but here goes.

1ST LEG
1 - Bransen
2 - Paolo
3 - Linz
4 - Godlewski
5 - Weaver

2nd LEG
1 - Linz
2 - Paolo
3 - Bransen
4 - Weaver
5 - Godlewski

puddin · « **Reply #2 on:** November 05, 2005, 07:48:03 PM »

mine will probably change too ..lack of videos lack of the Bransens , they are my choice to be eliminated this week with the Weavers a close second .

Please place your first to last picks for the 1ST LEG
1st) Paolo's , cane beats barrels
2nd) Weavers
3rd) Bransens
4th) Godlewski's , always 4th
5th) Linz , why not ? Ucheena & Joyce were victims of a mugging and survived ?

Please place your first to last picks for the 2nd LEG .
1st) Linz
2nd)Paolo's
3rd) Weavers
4th) Godlewskis ..again 4th as usual
5th) Bransen's .. Walder loses it for the girls ..why won't he listen to them ?

cinni · « **Reply #3 on:** November 07, 2005, 09:41:55 AM »

like i actually have a clue? i finally saw the preview last night and there was too much of the bransens and the paulos so that says safe for me. i think it's the weavers going home after the sisters get mugged again. i also think that the paulos and linz will be out in front for this round. middle is wild guessing.

1st) paolo
2nd) linz
3rd) weaver
4th) bransen
5th) godlewskis

1st) linz
2nd) paolo
3rd) bransen
4th) godlewskis
5th) weaver

Mike-e · « **Reply #4 on:** November 07, 2005, 10:30:00 AM »

No clue...

1st) Linz
2nd) Bransen
3rd) Godlewski
4th) Paolo
5th) Weaver

1st) Linz
2nd) Bransen
3rd) Godlewski
4th) Paolo
5th) Weaver

rmax · « **Reply #5 on:** November 07, 2005, 12:12:35 PM »

Well, I'm a bit behind in reading the thread here, but in the RII poll, I picked (randomly) the Godlewski's for elimination. Makes sense that the first hour/leg would be NEL.

Totally random guesses:

Please place your first to last picks for the 1ST LEG
1st) Weavers
2nd) Linz
3rd) Bransen
4th) Godlewski
5th) Paolo (NEL)

Please place your first to last picks for the 2nd LEG .
1st) Linz (they've got to start coming in first eventually!)
2nd) Bransen
3rd) Paolo
4th) Weaver
5th) Godlewski (eliminated)

mcalpine9 · « **Reply #6 on:** November 07, 2005, 01:02:45 PM »

Please place your first to last picks for the 1ST LEG
1st) Weavers
2nd) Bransen
3rd) Paolos
4th) Godlewski
5th) Linz (NEL)

Please place your first to last picks for the 2nd LEG .
1st) Paolo
2nd) Godlewski
3rd) Weaver
4th) Paolo
5th) Bransens (eliminated)

puddin · « **Reply #7 on:** November 07, 2005, 11:37:41 PM »

glad to have you here mcalpine9

, and thank you for voting :yaya: .

supsandalee · « **Reply #8 on:** November 08, 2005, 09:54:24 AM »

If this isn't ok here fell free to move. Does anyone want to give their reasons for their elimination pick? A case for and against these teams getting eliminated can probrably be made. Here are some of mine but please add to or dismiss some. I'm curious to see how everyone else is thinking.

Godlewski:
against - toronto spoiler with 4 hot girls but doesn't make much sense with sign to go to Boston
for - always running in the bottom

Bransen:
against - shown getting lost in Arizona (CBS misdirection)
for -

Weaver:
against - toronto spoiler says they saw "a family" which is probably Weaver or Paolo
for - always running in the bottom

Paolo:
against - toronto spoiler says they saw "a family" which is probably Weaver or Paolo
for - Gaghans said they got close to the Allieos and Paolos so they must have some time with them in sequesterville

Linz:
against - betting spoiler
for - none |#'

puddin · « **Reply #9 on:** November 08, 2005, 12:52:24 PM »

nicely done supsandalee

Linz Safe ~ winners per betting spoiler and mama Linz sorta spilled the beans .
Godlewskis safe ? Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 4:57 pm

2 groups that went by both groups of 4. One four hot girls and the other a familly.

Weavers , not sure ?? The other teams that were eliminated still seem bitter against the Weavers , did they get farther than the other teams thought they deserved ?

Also another spoiler , can't find it right now states something about a family 1 adult 3 children spotted in Toronto .. sounds like the Weavers to me , the Bransens don't look like Children imo .

Paolo's safe , running in the top , my guess is they make final 4 at best :':')

Bransens?? Daddy cussed " damn " infront of the girls ! Cuss and your history {l{ ! Point Papa Black said " damn " infront of the children ..the Blacks are now history !
The Aiellos said " Damn " during the mud-bogging ..history
The Schroeder kid called his step-mom a " bitch " ..history
Dad Gaghan said " Sonofabitch" in front of the children .. history ^/^ ..( as I'm typing this I realize how silly my theory sounds . )

The Godlewski sighting sounds sketchy but they are still in the race ..
so I see it as
Overall million $ winners

1st Linz
2nd Godlewskis or Weavers
3rd Weavers or Godlewskis

4th Paolo's

5th Bransens or Weavers

supsandalee · « **Reply #10 on:** November 08, 2005, 01:20:05 PM »

Quote from: puddin on November 08, 2005, 12:52:24 PM

Weavers , not sure ?? The other teams that were eliminated still seem bitter against the Weavers , did they get farther than the other teams thought they deserved ?

Also another spoiler , can't find it right now states something about a family 1 adult 3 children spotted in Toronto .. sounds like the Weavers to me , the Bransens don't look like Children imo .

Bransens?? Daddy cussed " damn " infront of the girls ! Cuss and your history {l{ ! Point Papa Black said " damn " infront of the children ..the Blacks are now history !
The Aiellos said " Damn " during the mud-bogging ..history
The Schroeder kid called his step-mom a " bitch " ..history
Dad Gaghan said " Sonofabitch" in front of the children .. history ^/^ ..( as I'm typing this I realize how silly my theory sounds . )

The only Toronto spoiler I saw was about 4 hot chicks and a family. I vaguely remember seeing something about 3 children but can't find it. It's not the decoy spoiler in Niagara is it?

Your Bransen theory doesn't necessarily seem silly. Editing is a funny thing and they could easily put something like that in right before a team is eliminated perhaps to make us think differently of them?

*(^

puddin · « **Reply #11 on:** November 08, 2005, 01:30:03 PM »

I'm looking for the family spoiler withe the Adult & 3 children , Gman posted it and I'm digging through the posts

:

puddin · « **Reply #12 on:** November 08, 2005, 01:57:31 PM »

Dug this out so the " Family " spoiler don't float , it came from the Niagara falls spec with alot of wrong info describing the teams ..

one team appeared to comprised of three children and only one parent.

http://forum.realityfanforum.com/index.php/topic,6511.45.html

Rob · « **Reply #13 on:** November 08, 2005, 01:57:53 PM »

My GUESSES! LOL

1st Leg
1 - Paolo
2 - Linz
3 - Godlewski
4 - Weaver
5 - Bransen - NEL

2nd LEG
1 - Linz
2 - Paolo
3 - Godlewski
4 - Bransen
5 - Weaver - GONE

cinni · « **Reply #14 on:** November 08, 2005, 02:45:00 PM »

the family spoiler really sounds more like the weavers than bransens and i kind of like the swearing theory, sigh. might have to rethink my picks for tonight.

puddin · « **Reply #15 on:** November 08, 2005, 02:58:18 PM »

Well the Paolo's always cuss so I discounted them {l{ , and all the Weavers really say are " shoot " or " Dang" ..

cinni, were still hoping for that early AOL promo

cinni · « **Reply #16 on:** November 08, 2005, 03:53:08 PM »

well since i have brownies tonight, you know what to do if you get the early promo. if it's the bransens going home, drop them from my team and take the paulos maybe? not the weavers and i still think the sisters are going to get mugged again. unless you get a tip for that too.

*hugz* {|

supsandalee · « **Reply #17 on:** November 08, 2005, 03:59:32 PM »

Quote from: cinni on November 08, 2005, 02:45:00 PM

the family spoiler really sounds more like the weavers than bransens and i kind of like the swearing theory, sigh. might have to rethink my picks for tonight.

The spoiler about 1 adult and 3 children came from the Niagra spoilers which were said to be decoys. They had descriptions of teams that don't match any of them.

The toronto spoiler just says 2 teams with one being 4 hot girls and the other a family. I consider the "family" description would most likely be Paolos or Weavers because of the younger ones.

puddin · « **Reply #18 on:** November 08, 2005, 04:48:57 PM »

If my beloved Paolo's make the final 3 then {**} !!
Any Paolo's lurking out there want to drop me a clue ? :yaya:

rmax · « **Reply #19 on:** November 08, 2005, 04:57:20 PM »

Well, I'm not a Paolo, but I just had to chime in here to say that any description of a "family" (in the traditional sense, Mom, Dad, kids) has to be the Paolos at this point, if it's a credible spoiler.

As many know, I don't much care for the Weavers, which probably means they will survive longer than the Bransens. In the MW game, I did swap out Bransens for Paolos, and am guessing the Bransens are the eliminated team (sigh).

supsandalee · « **Reply #20 on:** November 08, 2005, 05:09:09 PM »

Quote from: puddin on November 08, 2005, 04:48:57 PM

If my beloved Paolo's make the final 3 then {**} !!
Any Paolo's lurking out there want to drop me a clue ? :yaya:

I'm with you puddin but in Toronto there are probably still 4 teams in the race, right?

News:

Poll

Which team will get saved by a NEL ? Which team will be eliminated ?

Author Topic: EP7 : Elimination Poll (Read 5901 times)