Reality Fan Forum - The Amazing Race Spoilers - Big Brother Live Feed Updates - Survivor Spoilers - Reality TV Spoilers - Big Brother Spoilers
Archive => RFF Archived Boards => Survivor Cook Islands => Topic started by: Rob on November 09, 2006, 07:59:08 PM
-
Wow, a little bit taken aback, but that looks cool!!!
-
Oh TDT missed it by one jurer ( shhhhhh ) because I read spoilers :D
-
Yea I was a little suprised to, but that was one of my all time favorite episodes of Survivor. I thought it was just an all around great show.
-
i love it! makes them think a little more about the next boot since that person/persons will have a say. is it going to be a jury of 10 then? or will someone else go home not on the jury? maybe a final 3? but that could still leave a tie? so many questions yet.
can't wait to watch the show later tonight. (still @ work but read the show analysis at mess.)
-
How about Jonathan getting snippy with JEFF :lol3:? LOL
-
How about Jonathan getting snippy with JEFF :lol3:? LOL
it was bound to happen. :lol:
-
I loved how Jeff then commented about how he was getting annoyed with him. It was hilarious.
-
HaHa it would have been funny if Jeff got to snuff Jon's torch :snics:
-
Oh my gosh that would have been awesome. The look on Jeff's face would have been priceless.
-
I think it's the name. People love to be snippy with people named Jeff. ;)
-
HaHa it would have been funny if Jeff got to snuff Jon's torch :snics:
If it wasn't for knowing Brad was getting the boot, & getting points for him in our games, how hilarious if Jon's torch could've been snuffed last nite!! :lol3: :lol3: That would've made our day uhh...week! :yess: When Jeff does snuff Jonathan's torch, what a hoot!!! :lol3:
Gosh, I hope Jonathan doesn't make it to the final two! :groan: However, it would be GREAT entertainment to see Jeff & Jon at each other's throats!! :lol:
The audience would either :rfth: OR :clap: :rotf: :ron: :hyper: !!! :lol3:
-
What if in addition to a super sized jury, there is a final three instead of a final two?
-
Wasn't something like that posted here somewhere 2 or 3 wk ago? ???
-
I'm not sure. I don't go back and read up. I'm too lazy. LOL
-
I think it's the name. People love to be snippy with people named Jeff. ;)
:lol: ;D
-
The finale will have the final 5 instead of the usual 3 or 4. spec is there very well could be a final 3 for the million$$ YAY! !
-
I just listened to Rob and Trevor before the podcast so that's what brought up the subject this afternoon.
-
The finale will have the final 5 instead of the usual 3 or 4. spec is there very well could be a final 3 for the million$$ YAY! !
Ok, that's what I recall reading, just don't remember where. So the F3 would EACH get a million or F1 gets 1mil & the other two each 1/2 Mil? (if the specs are correct)
-
I thought it meant the finale would have final 5, then they would be cut down to three and the jury would have to vote on those three to give the money two. That way they could have a jury of 10 and still not have a tie.
-
But if there was a Final 3, that means that only 9 will be on the Jury, so there is still the potential for a tie.
Before Brad was voted off last night, there was 12 people!! Still can tie with final 3 :)
Rob
-
Ahh Rob is right. Now I remember a spoiler that said the jury would be 10 :).
-
What would happen if there was a tie? Would they just split it? I mean...I guess the challenge portion of the game is over by then.
-
I asked the same thing. Maybe America would decide
-
Great idea, TannerB! :tup: If there's a tie, why not let America decide! This is a season of twists & new stuff , so America voting would be appropriate! :jam:
-
Great idea, TannerB! :tup: If there's a tie, why not let America decide! This is a season of twists & new stuff , so America voting would be appropriate! :jam:
If America gets to vote, won't Burnett be like choosing the winner, since editing influences how we see each contestant?
-
Well kicks, we have three people to choose from and America will be sending in the votes. I don't think the editing impacts much of the public's views because the editors have to fit the show into an hour time slot and they need just the best scenes.
So, in brief, Bennet choses who we see, but we will make the ultimate decision.
-
Hm...that would be a really cool twist. Now I'm curious to see how it's going to turn out.
-
What an awesome FIRST for all SURVIVOR fans if WE could FINALLY get to choose the winner! :jumpy: :jam:
-
moved to spoilers
-
I'm not so comfortable with the idea of us voting for the winner. I like when you never know. There have been Survivor seasons I loved the ending to, and some I have not. It's a crap shoot, but that's what makes it fun.
-
How can we vote? The finale and Jeff reading the votes is only 1 hour.
-
Yea, that's the other problem.
-
Couldn't we vote after the Dec 14 show ends and before the Finale begins? (Dec 17)
We voted for Rupert as America's favorite, but maybe the voting time was over a week or so? ???
-
Couldn't we vote after the Dec 14 show ends and before the Finale begins? (Dec 17)
We voted for Rupert as America's favorite, but maybe the voting time was over a week or so? ???
But the Dec 14th show, we will still have 4 or 5 players left, not just 2? Am I right, isn't the final show 2 hours long, and then the 1 hour reunion?
Rob
-
Needless to say. America calling in the winner is NOT going to happen. It just wouldn't work. Why mess with it anyway? If they want to have us vote for someone to win a car or money, fine. But not the game.
-
Yeah, who cares about who we think should win, that's up to the Jury to decide.