Archive > Survivor 8: All Stars

Here's a thought...

<< < (4/4)

Bathfizzy:

--- Quote ---I agree with everyone that public voting would be a bad idea. We only see what the directors want us to see. They probably edit out so much stuff that is pertinent to game play, but not entertaing to watch on TV, that we would end up voting someone off who really deserved to be there while letting someone stay just because we like the way they look or talk or whatever!
I do like the idea of maybe 1 immunity challenge being a viewer vote off just to mix it up a bit.
Expect the unexpected
--- End quote ---

I agree.  It would really difficult for the viewers to see what is really going on and we might vote off the wrong person.  I think it would be fun to let the viewing public switch members of the tribe around.  So this really screws up any alliances made. (something like what they did in the Amazon when Jenna and Dave picked new members for their tribe).

drumstyx47:
I don't think that would be a good idea at all.  First off, it would be bad for ratings (32 days as opposed to 13 weeks). Second, Survivor is about PLAYING THE GAME. It's not a popularity contest like other shows, it's about backstabbing forming alliances, not being America's Sweetheart.  Third, America would vote out the villains right away, and then what would we watch, a bunch of happy people sitting around on an island? Did anyone else watch I'm A Celebrity, Get Me Outta Here? Because, if you did, you would realize that the idea would sink Survivor forever!  >:(

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page