Archive > The Amazing Race 27 Spoilers

TAR 27 Bitch, Moan & Squeal Thread **SPOILERS**

<< < (77/115) > >>

bottle:
or NHL girls. you're awesome Justin and Diana  :conf:

Bookworm:
Flo & Zach were in an alliance to take out the twins in the first few legs

And Freddy & Kendra were in a "model alliance" with Hayden and Aaron

RachelLeVega:

--- Quote from: Bookworm on October 16, 2015, 03:43:58 PM ---Flo & Zach were in an alliance to take out the twins in the first few legs

And Freddy & Kendra were in a "model alliance" with Hayden and Aaron

--- End quote ---
TAR3: That was Aaron & Arianne's wish. I think Flo & Zach were just with them so they could socialize with a team. Plus, Flo had a flirtmance with one of the twins in Switzerland...

Jobby:
lol, I just do not like alliances in general. It makes me sick and take the fun out of watching.

Especially when they are EXPLICITLY done. :)

And to be honest, there are only a few teams who won because their alliance brought them there:
- Not Rob and Brennan because they were the stronger team anyway
- Chris and Alex ??? No???
- Flo and Zach, maybe so
- Reichen and Chip, ??? No???
- Chip and Kim, their alliance... wasn't so clear?
- Freddy and Kendra didn't need the help of an alliance to propel them further
- Uchenna and Joyce, maybe their alliance with Meredith and Gretchen effectively eliminated them, but they were the more important ones in the alliance and didn't really need one
- Linz Family, against Weavers with Godlewski and Bransens... but they were strong on their own anyway
- Tyler and James against BQ's... effectively eliminated them but they would have made the F3 on their own
- Eric and Danielle, no alliance and won
- TK and Rachel, no alliance?
- Nick and Starr, no alliance?
- Tammy and Victor, no clear alliance? Unless it was against Kisha and Jen? No?
- Meghan and Cheyne, no clear alliance?
- Dan and Jordan, no clear alliance?
- Nat and Kat, no clear alliance?
- Kisha and Jen, no clear alliance?
- Ernie and Cindy, no clear alliance?
- Rachel and Dave, clearly didn't need an alliance to win
- Josh and Brent, wasn't even in an alliance with Abbie and Ryan
- Bates and Anthony, maybe the alliance didn't make them a target, which gave them the win? Would have made the F3 based on their own efforts
- Jason and Amy, with Nicole and Travis? Effectively eliminating Leo and Jamal, no? Would have made the F3 on their own
- Dave and Connor, had an alliance against Brendon and Rachel.. but would have made the F3 on their own merits?
- Amy and Maya, made the F3 because of a twist, and made it further because the target was on Kym and Allie but not them.

--- Quote ---amy and maya had a 4 team alliance during season 25.
--- End quote ---
I don't really think the teams in that season were in an "alliance"? They just did not like Kym and Allie as they were running their own race. The only scene I could remember about strategy was on the boat where they were discussing possibilities to U-TURN them because they were a strong team
- Tyler and Laura's alliance was with....?

I named 26 seasons and I believe, not MANY winning teams needed an alliance to win?

I think alliances in general are fun to watch, I just didn't like it when it's EXPLICITLY made and whenever that happens, the editors make a big deal out of it and usually MY viewing pleasure as an audience decreases because I normally focus on the location for TAR, and less on the drama. And that may be why I did not enjoy TAR 22 because Mona and Beth and Youtube were targeted for unknown reasons (working with Jessica and John??) even though I was supporting Country Singers, Maxie and Bates and Anthony...

Jobby:
At the end of the day, it's a Bitch, Moan and Squeal thread. So... peace out. :)

With that said TAR 25 >>> TAR 27 >>> TAR 26

And that is disappointing considering I was told this will be a great season to look out for.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page