Archive > The Amazing Race 24 Spoilers
TAR 24 Speculation and Discussion **of Spoilers**
jetishidae:
too bad so sad, Brenchel will definitely in Final 3.
Anothe full season of Brenchel coming in February :cmas9
selfeviction:
--- Quote from: gamerfan09 on December 15, 2013, 11:06:55 AM ---Just drink your haterade everyone. Just drink it right now.
--- End quote ---
^YESS!! #DONTHATEONBRENCHEL
georgiapeach:
--- Quote from: gamerfan09 on December 15, 2013, 10:34:39 AM ---To be honest, I think after Margie & Luke got eliminated, there was an HoO of sorts in Sri Lanka 2. Because there is no way that that giant time span would allow Brenchel to catch up and CaroJen to fall to last.
--- End quote ---
We do NOT know when Margie and Luke were eliminated. We all need to remember that NOT seen does NOT always mean NOT there. We need much more info before making assumptions. :tup:
gamerfan09:
--- Quote from: georgiapeach on December 16, 2013, 03:03:44 AM ---
--- Quote from: gamerfan09 on December 15, 2013, 10:34:39 AM ---To be honest, I think after Margie & Luke got eliminated, there was an HoO of sorts in Sri Lanka 2. Because there is no way that that giant time span would allow Brenchel to catch up and CaroJen to fall to last.
--- End quote ---
We do NOT know when Margie and Luke were eliminated. We all need to remember that NOT seen does NOT always mean NOT there. We need much more info before making assumptions. :tup:
--- End quote ---
But Peach, this IS Speculation. Just saying. :)
theschnauzers:
--- Quote from: gamerfan09 on December 16, 2013, 06:35:43 AM ---
--- Quote from: georgiapeach on December 16, 2013, 03:03:44 AM ---
--- Quote from: gamerfan09 on December 15, 2013, 10:34:39 AM ---To be honest, I think after Margie & Luke got eliminated, there was an HoO of sorts in Sri Lanka 2. Because there is no way that that giant time span would allow Brenchel to catch up and CaroJen to fall to last.
--- End quote ---
We do NOT know when Margie and Luke were eliminated. We all need to remember that NOT seen does NOT always mean NOT there. We need much more info before making assumptions. :tup:
--- End quote ---
But Peach, this IS Speculation. Just saying. :)
--- End quote ---
gamerfan09, please look at the way you referenced Margie-Luke; you said "when" and "there was" as to an HOO, both of which presupposes that what you are saying are facts, and does not indicate in any way that it was speculation (which might be shown by the words "if" and "there may have been.")
Seriously folks, if you don't use the appropriate word signals to show your statements are speculation and not facts, others are going to read what you are saying as being a fact. Same issue when stating a belief as a fact. It may be a fact that you believe something happened at some point to a team or teams during filming; that is not the same as a statement being established as a fact by vetted independent sources, or properly vetted photographs and video that connects the image to a particular place on a particular date.
It's very frustrating for some of us who are trying to sort out what is established fact, from speculation or belief or wishful thinking. Please take some care in how you are expressing your thoughts in this context. It does cause confusion and can easily mislead others who may miss the nuances that are present in these sorts of discussion.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version