Archive > Big Brother 13

Veto Question

<< < (3/3)

davidandrew23:

--- Quote from: Alfwin on September 01, 2011, 10:10:36 AM ---It is most probably a rule.

--- End quote ---

So it is an opinion....

Any other thoughts?

ThunderStruck:

--- Quote from: ThunderStruck on August 29, 2011, 03:18:02 PM ---OK,  serious question here. Please help me out.
If Adam or Shelly won POV, and both agreed to take down Rachel and Jordan (duo effect) (and I know they wouldn't have) but if they did...
Who would have ended up on the block?  You can't be a replacement nom if you have the veto and you can't be nom'd if you're HOH.
So Adam/Shelly were Veto holders, Rachel/Jordan were removed from the block and Porsche/Kalia were HOH. Who would have gone up BB?  :duno:

--- End quote ---
I asked that the other day and this was the answer that satisfied my curiosity...
It works the same as the final Veto, when there are only 4 players.  1 is HOH, 2 are nominated, 1 is safe.
If the person who is already safe wins the veto, it is void.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page