Archive > Big Brother Live Feed Updates
Ongoing BB13 Discussion of the Live Feeds
cookie lady:
I'm confussed about the regulators alliance. Are they voting to keep Keith, or did he do something to make his alliance all mad at him? If so, what was it that he did.
chinese takeout:
OK what's the beef folks have Lawon? And will Keith go? Keith to me is a powder keg ready to explode and he's a possible threat in some competitions. Whereas, Porshe she a hot mess and I don't see a threat there.
Help me out here....thoughts?
Mandoli:
--- Quote from: Libby on July 11, 2011, 09:40:55 AM ---Why then, does the second half of a duo still get to play for HoH the week following their partner's reign? I'm struggling to wrap my head around how that is fair or logical.
--- End quote ---
Because technically, all power of nominating people rests solely on the HOH. Brendon isn't in charge of nominating people. It's like the clique twist - even though someone from your clique won HOH last week, and even though you were safe and stuff, you still played HOH the next week to see if you could keep safety in your clique.
I'm sure someone'll explain it all Thursday.
TexasLady:
I'm confused too, are they keeping keith or Porsche. I could see keeping her IF they really have her but she's very touchy and rigid as a person so I'm not sure the vets could count on her as an ally.
Dick's leaving left a mess for the golden key because for good or ill it's all messed up now. Dani is safe and is the uber floater at the moment.
Libby:
--- Quote from: Mandoli on July 11, 2011, 02:44:11 PM ---
--- Quote from: Libby on July 11, 2011, 09:40:55 AM ---Why then, does the second half of a duo still get to play for HoH the week following their partner's reign? I'm struggling to wrap my head around how that is fair or logical.
--- End quote ---
Because technically, all power of nominating people rests solely on the HOH. Brendon isn't in charge of nominating people. It's like the clique twist - even though someone from your clique won HOH last week, and even though you were safe and stuff, you still played HOH the next week to see if you could keep safety in your clique.
I'm sure someone'll explain it all Thursday.
--- End quote ---
I understand, I just don't think it's 100% fair. By that logic, Brendon is allowed to compete next week because he isn't technically HoH this week and the noms aren't his. But, if that's true, it should work that way all around. He shouldn't be safe from eviction, benefit from the veto, or get a pass on Have Nots either because he isn't technically HoH this week. The partner of the HoH.....not singling out Brendon, he's just the person that fits this week..... gets all of the benefit and doesn't have to suffer the consequence.
I can see making the partner of the HoH exempt from nomination, because that would benefit the HoH directly (although, what are the odds the HoH would nominate their own partner anyway) so that would be an HoH perk, which is justifiable. But I really can't make sense of how they are exempt from Have Nots AND still get to play for HoH next week. That seems like they are getting the best of both worlds.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version