The Amazing Race > The Amazing Race Discussion

Non-Elimination Legs

<< < (9/11) > >>

Dånooky:

--- Quote from: misterblah on March 23, 2010, 11:23:11 AM ---Non elim legs have to be in the race since ther would be more episodes and locations. But I hate it when a back-of-the-pack team is always saved by non-elim.  (:;)

--- End quote ---
Well...obviously a back o the pack team will be saved by a NEL, since the NEL'd team is usually the last one...

redskevin88:

--- Quote ---Evan Weinstein  (I)
Producer: "The Amazing Race: Donkeys Have Souls, Too (#12.1)". Visit IMDb for Photos, ... Find where Evan Weinstein is credited alongside another name ...
--- End quote ---

Wadsy:
I know this topic has not been responded to in many years but I wanted to mention a few things.
I don't believe in the producers saving a favorite team, but I have to question situations where teams were unable to finish a challenge where Phil had to go to their location and eliminate them.

Could any of these been a non-elimination that was changed because that team had no chance of catching up?
TAR 11 Leg 9
TAR 15 Leg 7
TAR 29 Leg 4 (probably unlikely)
TAR 30 Leg 9

Would producers be allowed to do this even?
It's those four episodes above that really stood out to me.

Declive:
I love that Luke started this thread.  :2hearts:

claude_24hrs:
TAR 23 Leg 3 was planned to be a NEL but with a late arrival of Chester & Ephraim in Lisbon, this changed into an EL.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page