The Amazing Race > The Amazing Race Discussion
Questions and Discussion thread for TAR stats
Zack.:
--- Quote from: apskip on December 05, 2009, 03:34:54 PM ---
--- Quote from: theschnauzers on December 05, 2009, 11:15:29 AM ---
For the record, Eric/Jeremy have the best placement average in the history of TAR (1.75). Meghan and Cheyne cannot best that performance no matter how they finish the final leg of 15. And this is what make E/J's second place finish such a shock. Those two really did dominate their season.
--- End quote ---
And I will point out that Eric/Jeremy were great when it was not vital to be, but they finished behind BJ/Tyler in each of the final 3 legs of AR9. So, which is those teams is really the superior one?
--- End quote ---
It's also easier to beat 2 teams than it is to beat 10.
And in TARA 2, Marc and Rovilson won 8 of 12 legs, including 7 in a row (unless you want to count Japan as a separate leg, in which case it would be 8 of 13, including 4 in a row). And much like TAR 9, the winning team had a higher placement average than the (in this case) third-place team.
theschnauzers:
I'm not going to comment on the regional editions of TAR because I have not seen them and therefore, I can't say that direct comparisons can be made.
Jobby:
--- Quote from: apskip on December 05, 2009, 03:34:54 PM ---
--- Quote from: theschnauzers on December 05, 2009, 11:15:29 AM ---
For the record, Eric/Jeremy have the best placement average in the history of TAR (1.75). Meghan and Cheyne cannot best that performance no matter how they finish the final leg of 15. And this is what make E/J's second place finish such a shock. Those two really did dominate their season.
--- End quote ---
And I will point out that Eric/Jeremy were great when it was not vital to be, but they finished behind BJ/Tyler in each of the final 3 legs of AR9. So, which is those teams is really the superior one?
--- End quote ---
:funny: So what about the 2 NELs that BJ and Tyler fell on? Superior indeed... :res:
Hooky:
--- Quote from: Joab on December 06, 2009, 07:46:41 AM ---
--- Quote from: apskip on December 05, 2009, 03:34:54 PM ---
--- Quote from: theschnauzers on December 05, 2009, 11:15:29 AM ---
For the record, Eric/Jeremy have the best placement average in the history of TAR (1.75). Meghan and Cheyne cannot best that performance no matter how they finish the final leg of 15. And this is what make E/J's second place finish such a shock. Those two really did dominate their season.
--- End quote ---
And I will point out that Eric/Jeremy were great when it was not vital to be, but they finished behind BJ/Tyler in each of the final 3 legs of AR9. So, which is those teams is really the superior one?
--- End quote ---
:funny: So what about the 2 NELs that BJ and Tyler fell on? Superior indeed... :res:
--- End quote ---
They were smart enough to know that they would be non-elims! Ha! :funny:
ImANewUser:
--- Quote from: Hooky on December 11, 2009, 06:40:25 PM ---
--- Quote from: Joab on December 06, 2009, 07:46:41 AM ---
--- Quote from: apskip on December 05, 2009, 03:34:54 PM ---
--- Quote from: theschnauzers on December 05, 2009, 11:15:29 AM ---
For the record, Eric/Jeremy have the best placement average in the history of TAR (1.75). Meghan and Cheyne cannot best that performance no matter how they finish the final leg of 15. And this is what make E/J's second place finish such a shock. Those two really did dominate their season.
--- End quote ---
And I will point out that Eric/Jeremy were great when it was not vital to be, but they finished behind BJ/Tyler in each of the final 3 legs of AR9. So, which is those teams is really the superior one?
--- End quote ---
:funny: So what about the 2 NELs that BJ and Tyler fell on? Superior indeed... :res:
--- End quote ---
They were smart enough to know that they would be non-elims! Ha! :funny:
--- End quote ---
Flo & Zach knowing Leg 9 was a NEL <33333. :funny: Actually, two consecutive F5 NEL seasons always deliver. <33333
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version