Archive > Big Brother
Ongoing BB10 Feed "Discussion
Gnattering:
--- Quote from: TexasLady on September 10, 2008, 05:35:09 PM ---
--- Quote from: ThunderStruck on September 10, 2008, 05:03:04 PM ---Hey, live feeders, do you normally get to watch the 2nd competition or is it fish the whole time and you try to figure out who won by what they say when they come back?
--- End quote ---
No we don't get to see it. (Unless we have a feed slip, which has happened in the past!) :jumpy:
--- End quote ---
I think that we can guess by body language on Showtime. Don't remember what they did last summer; I recall Shebot was in full-blown threat mode to Adam, so the results were fairly clear. Not sure though, as the Shebot lost the first part -- and went on whining about how that all went wrong and she never wins anything and she needs it more than ....
kindly yes:
read on another site Mempass knocked Jerry out in round-- cornerofficeX?
of course i'd want confirmation of that
furzball:
The feeds are still fish. There haven't been any live bleeds.
So............................ :duno:
TARAsia Fan:
--- Quote from: kindly yes on September 10, 2008, 07:10:46 PM ---read on another site Mempass knocked Jerry out in round-- cornerofficeX?
of course i'd want confirmation of that
--- End quote ---
Unless someone is live blogging directly from the BB control room or from the CBS lot, I would take that with a grain of salt.
Gnattering:
--- Quote from: bbjunkey on September 10, 2008, 07:04:04 PM ---Does anyone else have a bad feeling about Memphis and this second comp? If M screws up, D is going to be a bit P.O.'d --ya think? I'm going to be watching D's reaction. -- I'm still hoping he has that secret veto power under wraps that he or Julie can talk about yet.
--- End quote ---
What secret veto power -- how did that come about and when?
I have a question about three nights ago: in the HOH room, Memphis was weighing the ethics of "taking the old man's money and then voting him out". I nearly choked on "weighing the ethics" here, since he has a sliding scale of what is ethical (not that being in the BB house is conducive to maintaining whatever sense of ethics a person has/had in the first place . . . skip down to continue this little side trip).
I know Dan had told him not to broach the subject of buying safety but wait for Jerry to offer it up. Then they were talking like Jerry had made the offer -- I couldn't tell for sure. Can anybody fill me in on that?
...ethics: The moral oKeesha stayed true. Sharon stayed true. The boys threw them both overboard at the last minute (though they kept Sharon to do more of their work one week longer than Keesha has been kept around).
. . . and the moral of that story, for both the ladies -- and they really are -- is
"Never enter into an alliance with more than one man;
you'll be bucking the Butch-Sundance fantasy in the end."
another "ethics" note: It was clear all along that they boys were using her as long as possible, though things could always have turned. Then, with Rennie gone from her place as the next person out, and they were stuck with Jerry, it was "Us three against the world" as planned, and then it morphed into the rationalization of, "Well, it'll be easier to evict her out of four than out of three. . . ." Keeping Jerry was some sort of redemption for them: Penance for evicting Keesha and the person to take the eviction out of three.
What they didn't count on is that he's a tough old bird and he just might take these competitions. I hope so: they need more penance with a healthy dose of karma for what they did to the lady.
Do we get a chance to vote for America's Favorite? I hope so: Keesha earned the dough the right way. Still burned about April of Sunnybrook farm not liking the designer duds. Memphis got one thing right, calling her "The Cryptkeeper."
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version