Archive > The Mole

The Mole 5.0 *Ongoing Clue Analysis and Challenge Discussions*

<< < (116/141) > >>

multi007:
 I knew it wasnt Paul.  The mole could not be so loud, vocal, arogant, to bring the focus to him.   Im still thinking its Craig.    The early clue "I lie with my eyes" gives me Craig.  I know there were other clues, but this is the only one that gets me thinking Craig.  Stll not sure about that baby cry though.  That gets me thinking Nicole.   

Mrs Shrek:
I was hoping the Mole was Paul, because although he was loud and aggressive and in your face, he couldn't directly be pinned to many sabotages, but at the same time was still causing others to lose focus and lose missions. I will be really disappointed if the Mole turns out to be Craig. I would just feel like the producers had "dummed it down" and made the Mole clues too easy if that is the case, cos so many clues seem to be pointing to him from early on (one of the reasons I had ruled him out as the mole). I will be happier if I find out Nicole was the Mole, and Mark would be absolutely fantastic, just because any moleish activity he had carried out was so subtle, and the blame in each case transferred to other people, which is what the mole should be doing - making others look guilty, while looking innocent himself. Unfortunately I don't think that Mark was the Mole, but I can always hope.... :lol:
I have watched a few of the International versions of the Mole, in addition to season 1 and 2 of the US series. Every time there is someone who you think is "likely to be the Mole" from early on, but each time I have either been pleasantly surprised to find out who the Mole actually was, or have only cottoned on to the real Mole in the final few episodes. The Mole revealed episode is always great, when you get to see what sabotage was overlooked, or the blame was able to be transferred to another contestant. I am really really really really hoping that this Mole comeback isn't going to be a big let down because they have tried to appeal to a wider audience by diluting the original concept too much.

puddin:
 :waves:

randallcornelius:
well, i feel pretty special right now...the two least likely players that could have been the mole based on what little we knew from the first episode, yet i said might be the mole anyways, are still here. Mark and Craig have been my suspects all along, and i don't think i have any reason to change them...but I am going to point out that i don't think Mark is mole, and am actually leaning towards Nicole but I refuse to change my answer  :lala

I think that anyone one of the last three could be the mole, though...with enough manipulation to each clue, you could make anyone of them point to each of the final three. In my opinion, here's how i would rank the probabilities of the final three in each category:

Winner:

1. Mark
2. Craig
3. Nicole

Loser:

1. Nicole
2. Craig
3. Mark

Mole:

1. Nicole
2. Craig
3. Mark


obviously, based on what where i have placed craig, i am borderline with him right now. He is definitely the hardest to peg.  :duno:

marukisu:
Wel the journal entry would imply that the mole was hit by the paintball whic narrows it down to Nicole and Craig. Mark is off the radar and has been off the radar since that other journal enty when they did the Soccer game. Mark wouldnt comment on the soccer game if he were the mole because he was running up the hill with kristen.

Now in reference to the "Reflect" clue card if you reflect that word from the perspective it is shown then you get it showed normally instead of with the  mirror effect. So there froe it would imply that The Mole had a regular perspective. Thuis would point toward Nicole because she had the camera.

I must admit since my Paul theories were shot down i didnt know who it was but now im positive its Nicole.

Why cant ABC.com put these damn journal entires up after the episode. Also it seems like theyre will be a journal entry for episode 9.. Does this mean we will se that execution before the reunion?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version