Archive > Big Brother
BB9 ongoing *commentary* #3
sunshine26:
--- Quote from: JAM101 on March 29, 2008, 03:28:57 PM ---I don't get it.........why do these people think getting rid of Josh will mess James up. He couldn't feel any more isolated than he did before the POV. He even said he was in this game by/for himself. One more slam by the holy others is not going to break him, only give him more of an incentive to win.
--- End quote ---
hi ya! :waves: james and josh were laughing and plotting last night, james wants and needs josh in this game, it is a smarter move to keep sharon, i'm just going on smart gameplay, say if james as hoh he would be stupid to get rid of josh, the same goes there. dumb move to get rid of sharon, keeping favorites out, and just talking about smart gameplay in general, josh needs to go! james isnt by himself if he has josh in that house, they want F2!..james will do what he can to get josh to stay,[i am just talking gameplay play, and keeping favs out of the convo] just game in general :waves:
Blondie:
--- Quote from: Prickzy on March 29, 2008, 02:36:52 PM ---
--- Quote from: Mama2myboys on March 29, 2008, 01:42:28 AM ---
--- Quote from: Prickzy on March 29, 2008, 01:09:31 AM ---There is just no pleasing the majority of you. <_<
First Natalie says "Maybe we should get Sharon out", everyone freaks out "ITS CAUSE OF MATT" "NATALIE IS SO STUPID" and then she decides "Hey, we'll take out Josh" and now everyones like ":@ NATALIE HOW COULD YOU?"
Look. She's playing an important game. She can't screw this up, I don't think she cares that you're angry because she blamed something on someone else to get further in the game. This game is about lying. The only time lying ever makes me mad is when they proclaim their word is better in DRs, to their allies and generally all the time(James) and then go back on it. She's a liar, so what? I'm sure you people would pass the blame on someone else to get a step closer to $500, 000. :P
--- End quote ---
Excuse me, but I was upset/angry over her making a stupid choice to send Sharon out, it will affect her game. Im sorry but it WILL. And just because im a fan of Sharon is not why I am saying that. I do like Sharon and will miss her (just like I still miss Alex) but I do think Natalie is dumb, why should she even put up Sharon and risk it. She told her the plan, obviously she doesn't want her out. So put up Ryan. Shes making a dumb mistake.
So I believe I can be angry, thats my opinion. Just like you have yours. I hate how Natalie preaches the bible, and then does what she does. Don't bring God into a game like this. Thats the problem I have.
If its not BECAUSE OF MATT - then why didn't she want to send Chelsia to sequester minutes after Chelsia telling her that her and Matt made out and Matt ??????? her? Why did she want to send James as a bday present?
My point is, I am a fan of Sharon. Point fingers all you want. One of my closest friends on this board is a fan of Josh (actually a few of them are) and either way we lose in my eyes. Because they don't want Josh to leave just as much as I don't want Sharon to leave.
With that said, im out of this I will not say any more about Natalie.
--- End quote ---
1. That wasn't even directed at you. My point was in general direction that she can't please everyone and her goal is to eliminate EVERYONE there. It's 500, 000. She's going to lie. She's going to try to take all those people out eventually. I never said it was a good or bad decision either way, I was just saying that she would never please everyone. That was my point. I wasn't attacking anyone in particular, I wasn't attacking anyone at all. You misunderstood my point. Apologies if I offended you.
2. I never said you couldn't be angry or you couldn't have your opinion, again, I never mentioned anyone at all. Apologies again?
3. Because James just took out her partner, lied directly into her face and she was his main target? The house was divided at that point and James wanted Natalie out more than anyone. Chelsia was third in the physical competition and everyone KNOWS she was a threat. I believe that's more than enough reason to get her out.
4. I never pointed fingers at anyone. Like Sharon. Like Josh. I never said anyone couldn't. I was just saying in a general direction that there is no pleasing everyone no matter what Natalie does and she WILL make these lies and WILL backstab people for half a million. Again, I didn't intend to personally attack anyone and you misconstrued my opinion as a personal attack. Apologies.
I think that's it, sorry for bringing this back but I didn't read it until now and I wanted to clear the air that I wasn't attacking you or anyone else for that matter.
--- End quote ---
It's okay Prickzy, Your post was pretty strong toward "you people", but as Allison would say, :lol3: :lol3: It's squashed now, :lol3: :lol3: so don't worry. Thanks for the apology! We value all opinions towards the house, the game, and the houseguests.
I'm Ron Burgundy?:
Again, when I was saying "You people" it was in a general direction. It was not about anyone/any group in particular. That was based off of posts I've seen on other boards and here. Like for example when I said "I don't think she cares that you're angry" I was saying that in general direction to state that she doesn't care if anyone on the internet says stuff about her, it was meant to be read in an observant manner and not in a direct one. Like I said it was misconstrued. If I was personally attacking anyone, I doubt I'd end the post with a smiley face. <_<
But like you said it is squashed now. :) All is well in RFF.
bhazlewood:
--- Quote from: Prickzy on March 29, 2008, 03:52:11 PM ---Again, when I was saying "You people" it was in a general direction. It was not about anyone/any group in particular. That was based off of posts I've seen on other boards and here. Like for example when I said "I don't think she cares that you're angry" I was saying that in general direction to state that she doesn't care if anyone on the internet says stuff about her, it was meant to be read in an observant manner and not in a direct one. Like I said it was misconstrued. If I was personally attacking anyone, I doubt I'd end the post with a smiley face. <_<
But like you said it is squashed now. :) All is well in RFF.
--- End quote ---
No!!! All is Not Well! I shall Smash You with The SheBot's Arsonal of Mighty Sayings.
HEAR ME.
KNOW THIS.
uh... OTHER THINGS ALSO.
There, you have been squashed accordingly, and all is now right with the universe of "8", where Gnat is the Princess Warrior of Light, Slaying Evil-Doers, And Sending them to Sequester Hell, where the Innocent Matty lies entrapped.
<<<< JOKE, JOKE, JOKE - Please disregard my warped sense of humor >>>>
anotherNCbbfan:
--- Quote from: Prickzy on March 29, 2008, 03:52:11 PM ---Again, when I was saying "You people" it was in a general direction. It was not about anyone/any group in particular. That was based off of posts I've seen on other boards and here. Like for example when I said "I don't think she cares that you're angry" I was saying that in general direction to state that she doesn't care if anyone on the internet says stuff about her, it was meant to be read in an observant manner and not in a direct one. Like I said it was misconstrued. If I was personally attacking anyone, I doubt I'd end the post with a smiley face. <_<
But like you said it is squashed now. :) All is well in RFF.
--- End quote ---
Oh we are all so misunderstood :(
It is definitely hard to know people will read something with the same demeanor it was typed with.
Only a limited number of people even get me or what I say...
And I am fine with being on an island all alone. :beer2:
Wait, I think James is here with me :ascared
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version