Archive > Survivor Cook Islands

Ding Dong Jonathan is Gone!

<< < (3/4) > >>

s1:
Yul, Ozzy,  Becky  & Sundra  didn't need  Jonathan  to  get  rid  of  Parvati  and  Adam.  They  got along  better with  P/A because   they were all  closer  to the   same age.    Jonathan  was closer to  the age  of their  fathers   and  probably  acted more like   their father  than  an equal.    He   had  a tendency  to   be bossy.   He came across  as   smug and  abraisive.    Sure  he  was  a  good provider  and  they did eat  very well  while  he  was there  but face   it,   there's only a few  days left  in the  game.    They   all ate  well thanks to  the  picnic  and  leftovers,  they  bonded  without  any  friction  while  Jonathan was at  Exile  Island.   He  had   served  his  purpose,  they  couldn't  see  any  use   for him  in  the  future  (4  Aitu   -   2 Raro),  it was  an  opportunity  to possibly  win votes (for Yul since  he    is  seen as  the  leader)  and  basically it  got  rid  of  negative energy.   Nobody  trusted Jonathan.   The 6  remaining know  where  they stand with each other (or  at  least  think they  do).    It really  made  sense for  Yul to get   rid of   Jonathan  but  it  was hard to  read  his vote  last  night  and   I would  have sworn  it looked like  he   had written Adam.     

Jeffrey Scott:
it must have been Adam. He was convinced he was going home. Personally, I lost some respect for Yul when he lied directly to Johnathan. He could have told him, and nothing would have changed.

s1:
I  don't expect  it is   so   but it  is  possible  if  Yul voted  for  Adam  he   didn't  know  for  sure  that  Jonathan  was  going.    Ozzy, Becky  &  Sundra  knew  Parvati  and  Adam  were voting for Jonathan.    It would  only  take  2  of them to  vote with  P/A  to vote  Jonathan out.

smsanfran:

--- Quote from: jeffreysg on December 08, 2006, 07:31:32 AM ---I actually wanted to see Johnathan go further. Adam annoys me, like most of his looks last night. He needed to stick around just a few weeks longer to get rid of Parvati and Aam. I just don't get why everyone wanted him gone. Was his personality that abrasive?

--- End quote ---

I agree - Adam is annoying - but I have to say that the energy level at camp when Jonathan was on Exile Island was so much better. While Yul/Ozzy/Sundra/Becky have the numbers to get rid of Parvati and Adam - we all know that can change in a flash. I hope it doesn't as I'd like to see Yul, Ozzy, Becky, and Sundra be the final 4.

Brn2Wander:

--- Quote from: s1 on December 08, 2006, 08:09:07 AM ---Yul, Ozzy,  Becky  & Sundra  didn't need  Jonathan  to  get  rid  of  Parvati  and  Adam.  They  got along  better with  P/A because   they were all  closer  to the   same age.    Jonathan  was closer to  the age  of their  fathers   and  probably  acted more like   their father  than  an equal.    He   had  a tendency  to   be bossy.   He came across  as   smug and  abraisive.    Sure  he  was  a  good provider  and  they did eat  very well  while  he  was there  but face   it,   there's only a few  days left  in the  game.    They   all ate  well thanks to  the  picnic  and  leftovers,  they  bonded  without  any  friction  while  Jonathan was at  Exile  Island.   He  had   served  his  purpose,  they  couldn't  see  any  use   for him  in  the  future  (4  Aitu   -   2 Raro),  it was  an  opportunity  to possibly  win votes (for Yul since  he    is  seen as  the  leader)  and  basically it  got  rid  of  negative energy.   Nobody  trusted Jonathan.   The 6  remaining know  where  they stand with each other (or  at  least  think they  do).    It really  made  sense for  Yul to get   rid of   Jonathan  but  it  was hard to  read  his vote  last  night  and   I would  have sworn  it looked like  he   had written Adam.     

--- End quote ---

I swear he voted for Adam....there were only 4 letters and I distinctly remember the name starting with an A. :cmas5

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version