Author Topic: Ratings  (Read 20121 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline theschnauzers

  • TAR Detectives
  • RFF Frantic Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 3559
  • An original TARfly
Re: Ratings
« Reply #50 on: January 10, 2018, 06:51:05 PM »
If the ratings of the premiere episode keep steady, I would have high hopes for that!

Besides, it's airing so early this year that there's plenty of time to shoot/edit a season for Autumn.
As things are, it would be difficult  The only way would be to compress some Survivor episodes as two hours in that time slot and rotate the two. CBS has never had a stable time slot for TAR other than this one, and they simply donít have a clue of what else would work long-term.
« Last Edit: January 10, 2018, 10:10:17 PM by theschnauzers »
-- theschnauzers

Offline georgiapeach

  • Amazing Race Moderator
  • RFF Administrator
  • I Live at RFF
  • *****
  • Posts: 49170
  • TAR Detective
Re: Ratings
« Reply #51 on: January 10, 2018, 06:55:10 PM »
 :mas25

There is plenty of time to shoot one for late spring too.
Whoever you are, I have always depended on the kindness of strangers.


Online Marionete

  • RFF Frantic Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 3016
  • The sky's more blue
Re: Ratings
« Reply #52 on: January 10, 2018, 06:55:47 PM »
How is Sundays 8pm for S10-S24 not a stable time slot?

Offline theschnauzers

  • TAR Detectives
  • RFF Frantic Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 3559
  • An original TARfly
Re: Ratings
« Reply #53 on: January 10, 2018, 10:17:51 PM »
How is Sundays 8pm for S10-S24 not a stable time slot?
The sports overruns in both spring and fall wrecked havoc for families wanting to watch the show or for recording the show for later viewing as well. As itís turning out, CBS is still having that problem, and also having itís Sunday scheduling deal with cable and premium cable airing new seasons of their hit shows in that Sunday night time slot as well.
-- theschnauzers

Online dryedmangoez

  • RFF Frantic Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 1834
    • DryedMangoez.com
Re: Ratings
« Reply #54 on: January 10, 2018, 11:31:24 PM »
NFL overruns, more often than not, actually helped TAR quite a bit, boosting TAR with a great lead in and maybe even artificially keeping TAR's  numbers higher than they might have been otherwise.


Offline theschnauzers

  • TAR Detectives
  • RFF Frantic Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 3559
  • An original TARfly
Re: Ratings
« Reply #55 on: January 11, 2018, 01:42:52 AM »
NFL overruns, more often than not, actually helped TAR quite a bit, boosting TAR with a great lead in and maybe even artificially keeping TAR's  numbers higher than they might have been otherwise.
Some weeks yes, other weeks not so much. But in the spring, the impact was more negative given that CBS for most of that period aired two weeks of March Madness, the Masters, and some other golf tournaments that ran way over...I can recall a few that were over an hour, and many viewers who DVRed the show got 60 Minutes and no TAR. Not to mention weeks being skipped because of special events both in the fall and spring. Wednesdayís has far fewer such problems over the earlier seasons.
-- theschnauzers

Online TheRabbi

  • RFF Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 215
Re: Ratings
« Reply #56 on: January 11, 2018, 10:13:57 AM »
1.4 rating for week 2. Slight drops from premieres always expected. Most other shows dropped as well.

Offline dangambler

  • RFF Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 151
Re: Ratings
« Reply #57 on: January 11, 2018, 10:46:16 AM »
Another solid week and win the night in viewers
« Last Edit: January 11, 2018, 09:19:26 PM by georgiapeach »

Offline Piper

  • RFF Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 86
Re: Ratings
« Reply #58 on: January 11, 2018, 12:17:55 PM »
Amazing Race Metrics for Episode 1 & 2.  Special thanks to The Rabbi for the correction earlier.  My hope is for TAR30 to sustain an overall increase to 18-48 group demographics and viewers (mil).  Hopefully, this will again validate TAR's bench strength in the CBS line-up and result in more seasons. 


« Last Edit: February 21, 2018, 12:23:27 AM by Piper »

Offline jb542

  • RFF Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 75
Re: Ratings
« Reply #59 on: January 11, 2018, 04:03:50 PM »
Final ratings are in and the demo stayed at 1.4 but the viewers went up a little bit below 7 million. Still good ratings as The Amazing Race was the #1 show of the night in viewers


Offline BourkieBoy

  • RFF Frantic Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 5688
  • I am King
Re: Ratings
« Reply #60 on: January 11, 2018, 05:08:48 PM »
Another good result! Let's hope it keeps going!  :cmas26
Just some weird Australian bloke, who loves reality TV shows...

Offline jb542

  • RFF Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 75
Re: Ratings
« Reply #61 on: January 12, 2018, 04:26:56 PM »
The Amazing Race DVR +3 ratings went from 1.6 to 2.0 in 18-49 demo and up from 7.325 million viewers to 8.797 viewers

Offline georgiapeach

  • Amazing Race Moderator
  • RFF Administrator
  • I Live at RFF
  • *****
  • Posts: 49170
  • TAR Detective
Re: Ratings
« Reply #62 on: January 12, 2018, 08:50:01 PM »
The Amazing Race DVR +3 ratings went from 1.6 to 2.0 in 18-49 demo and up from 7.325 million viewers to 8.797 viewers

Wow! Source please? Would love a link.
Whoever you are, I have always depended on the kindness of strangers.

Offline jb542

  • RFF Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 75
Re: Ratings
« Reply #63 on: January 13, 2018, 06:48:59 AM »
The Amazing Race DVR +3 ratings went from 1.6 to 2.0 in 18-49 demo and up from 7.325 million viewers to 8.797 viewers

Wow! Source please? Would love a link.

http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/dvr-ratings/week-15-broadcast-live-3-ratings-jan-1-7-2018/

Offline TARUSAFan

  • RFF Frantic Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 850
Re: Ratings
« Reply #64 on: January 13, 2018, 08:11:21 PM »
Love how the Ratings are going. I hope this is the road for more seasons and the return of double seasons a year. I think producers must note that a January start to a new season must be on the cards for future seasons + retain the timeslot.

Offline elthemagnifico

  • RFF Frantic Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 511
  • Previously as rafael02
Re: Ratings
« Reply #65 on: January 17, 2018, 03:10:23 AM »
Nah no need for double season two, would love to, but since TAR 29 now is  considered as the best season ever on TAR history thanks to single season a year, i prefer single season.
what might have been

Offline theschnauzers

  • TAR Detectives
  • RFF Frantic Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 3559
  • An original TARfly
Re: Ratings
« Reply #66 on: January 17, 2018, 03:01:13 PM »
Iím not sure the year long wait is as responsible as the time slot.
-- theschnauzers

Online Marionete

  • RFF Frantic Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 3016
  • The sky's more blue
Re: Ratings
« Reply #67 on: January 17, 2018, 04:41:25 PM »
Time slot has nothing to do with the quality of a season.

Offline DavidJunior

  • RFF Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 365
Re: Ratings
« Reply #68 on: January 17, 2018, 07:44:39 PM »
I think what El means is that production can create better races when they're focused on creating only one a year, as opposed to trying to build two each year.

I still think the quality of the races in 2-race years are still strong enough to warrant them returning to that set up.

Especially if CBS pushes for it- that might give production more money, availability to do more/have more on future races.

Offline GMR 602

  • RFF Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 103
Re: Ratings
« Reply #69 on: January 17, 2018, 07:55:25 PM »
TAR 29 was built and filmed as a part of a two season cycle.

It was not a standalone

Offline theschnauzers

  • TAR Detectives
  • RFF Frantic Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 3559
  • An original TARfly
Re: Ratings
« Reply #70 on: January 17, 2018, 11:47:27 PM »
Time slot has nothing to do with the quality of a season.
Time slot may have a lot to do about the ratings. I canít even begin to count the number of times Iíve read complaints about the different time slots TAR has endured since it was last on Wednesdayís, and how the particular time slot inconveniences viewers lives or family-time viewing.

Quality of the season hasnít been a factor in a time slot with the sole exception of TAR 8, which had several things that worked against it, but not the casting in general, IMHO.
-- theschnauzers

Offline georgiapeach

  • Amazing Race Moderator
  • RFF Administrator
  • I Live at RFF
  • *****
  • Posts: 49170
  • TAR Detective
Re: Ratings
« Reply #71 on: January 18, 2018, 01:28:06 AM »
Quote
THE AMAZING RACE was first in viewers for the second straight week (6.98m) and also won Wednesday in adults 25-54 (1.9/06) and adults 18-49 (1.4/06).

https://www.cbspressexpress.com/cbs-entertainment/shows/the-amazing-race/releases/view?id=49375
Whoever you are, I have always depended on the kindness of strangers.

Offline ilovetoread

  • RFF Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
Re: Ratings
« Reply #72 on: January 18, 2018, 08:44:18 AM »
I'm so glad they are touting this. I don't care we are burning 2 episodes at a time this season. More TAR on the Survivor hiatus is smart. Listen to what the viewers want CBS!

Online TheRabbi

  • RFF Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 215
Re: Ratings
« Reply #73 on: January 18, 2018, 10:17:09 AM »
1.5 rating for episode 3. Up a tick from last week. Yay!

Source: showbuzz daily

Offline GMR 602

  • RFF Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 103
Re: Ratings
« Reply #74 on: January 18, 2018, 10:25:40 AM »
What is the viewrship?
Does it matter a bit?