Exactly Belle, thank you.
This IS a speculation thread. But if you ARE speculating, you still need to say so CLEARLY.
Re-read what theschnauzers says please, he has it 100%.
gamerfan09, please look at the way you referenced Margie-Luke; you said "when" and "there was" as to an HOO, both of which presupposes that what you are saying are facts, and does not indicate in any way that it was speculation (which might be shown by the words "if" and "there may have been.")
This is RFF, not Sucks, jet...so we do things our way here. Regardless of whose spoilers you are quoting, HERE you must be VERY clear on what you are stating. When you are speculating, say so. If you can prove it, show us how. And remember that sourced spoilers are not considered facts without backup.
Sourced spoilers can be accurate. They can also be and are sometimes wrong. They are basically a spoiler that someone else
told you. Their reliability depends on where the info is coming from. Sources can be right, or can be wrong, or just can be misinterpreted. We have all had that happen, here at RFF also. Recently, you have only to look at how many changes were made in Cleo's cast list for 24 and even the latest bootlist spoilers to realize that mistakes can be made, info can change.
So what sets RFF apart is that whenever possible, we do not rely ONLY on "sourced info" but try to confirm it by other means. Sourced info can certainly be used for guidance, but it is not "proven". Unless and until there is clearcut (preferably photographic) or other first hand corroborative evidence (permits, eye witness accounts etc), any "sourced" info is considered speculative only. No matter who is saying it. So whether the current Sucks bootlist eventually turns out to be right or not, it is for now, at RFF anyway, "speculation" and not fact.
Hope that helps.