Brat Sophie won even though she didn't deserve to win. That's okay she joins the worst survivor winners ever list along with Sandra, Natalie.
No offense, but this comment really irks me. To win Survivor, you don't have to make bold moves or be America's Favorite Player. All you have to do is make it to Final Tribal Council, and get the most amount of jury votes, which is what Sophie did. How does she not deserve it then?
Yeah, people like Sophie, and Sandra, and Natalie may not have been entertaining to some people, but they did what Russell and Coach could not, which is convince the jury to vote for them at the end. Did Russell make bigger moves than Sandra and Natalie? Sure, but by doing so he angered multiple members of the jury in the process, making it extremely likely for them to vote for him. And while Coach was in control of the Upolu tribe, he too, angered people by not only constantly claiming to playing with "honor and integrity" but continuing his facade at Final Tribal Council, when he should have owned up to the moves he made.
So although you may not like their wins (personally, I too am not that big of a fan of Sophie) you have to give them credit for doing what the other players didn't, which is make it to the end, get enough jury votes, and ultimately win the $1 million.
Sorry if this sounds like a long ramble.....