Author Topic: SuperSized Jury!! (Read 12849 times)

Rob · « **on:** November 09, 2006, 07:59:08 PM »

Wow, a little bit taken aback, but that looks cool!!!

puddin · « **Reply #1 on:** November 09, 2006, 08:02:58 PM »

Oh TDT missed it by one jurer ( shhhhhh ) because I read spoilers

Vintage212 · « **Reply #2 on:** November 09, 2006, 08:03:18 PM »

Yea I was a little suprised to, but that was one of my all time favorite episodes of Survivor. I thought it was just an all around great show.

cinni · « **Reply #3 on:** November 09, 2006, 08:19:47 PM »

i love it! makes them think a little more about the next boot since that person/persons will have a say. is it going to be a jury of 10 then? or will someone else go home not on the jury? maybe a final 3? but that could still leave a tie? so many questions yet.

can't wait to watch the show later tonight. (still @ work but read the show analysis at mess.)

puddin · « **Reply #4 on:** November 09, 2006, 08:20:03 PM »

How about Jonathan getting snippy with JEFF

? LOL

Kogs · « **Reply #5 on:** November 09, 2006, 08:29:40 PM »

Quote from: puddin on November 09, 2006, 08:20:03 PM

How about Jonathan getting snippy with JEFF ? LOL

it was bound to happen.

Vintage212 · « **Reply #6 on:** November 09, 2006, 09:01:13 PM »

I loved how Jeff then commented about how he was getting annoyed with him. It was hilarious.

puddin · « **Reply #7 on:** November 09, 2006, 09:08:26 PM »

HaHa it would have been funny if Jeff got to snuff Jon's torch

Vintage212 · « **Reply #8 on:** November 10, 2006, 09:51:55 AM »

Oh my gosh that would have been awesome. The look on Jeff's face would have been priceless.

Jeffrey Scott · « **Reply #9 on:** November 10, 2006, 10:22:23 AM »

I think it's the name. People love to be snippy with people named Jeff.

RudyRules · « **Reply #10 on:** November 10, 2006, 03:47:55 PM »

Quote from: puddin on November 09, 2006, 09:08:26 PM

HaHa it would have been funny if Jeff got to snuff Jon's torch

If it wasn't for knowing Brad was getting the boot, & getting points for him in our games, how hilarious if Jon's torch could've been snuffed last nite!!

That would've made our day uhh...week!

When Jeff does snuff Jonathan's torch, what a hoot!!!

Gosh, I hope Jonathan doesn't make it to the final two!

However, it would be GREAT entertainment to see Jeff & Jon at each other's throats!!

The audience would either

OR :clap:

:

!!!

Jeffrey Scott · « **Reply #11 on:** November 10, 2006, 03:49:55 PM »

What if in addition to a super sized jury, there is a final three instead of a final two?

RudyRules · « **Reply #12 on:** November 10, 2006, 03:55:38 PM »

Wasn't something like that posted here somewhere 2 or 3 wk ago?

Jeffrey Scott · « **Reply #13 on:** November 10, 2006, 03:56:45 PM »

I'm not sure. I don't go back and read up. I'm too lazy. LOL

RudyRules · « **Reply #14 on:** November 10, 2006, 04:00:45 PM »

Quote from: jeffreysg on November 10, 2006, 10:22:23 AM

I think it's the name. People love to be snippy with people named Jeff.

puddin · « **Reply #15 on:** November 10, 2006, 04:40:56 PM »

The finale will have the final 5 instead of the usual 3 or 4. spec is there very well could be a final 3 for the million$$ YAY! !

Jeffrey Scott · « **Reply #16 on:** November 10, 2006, 04:42:16 PM »

I just listened to Rob and Trevor before the podcast so that's what brought up the subject this afternoon.

RudyRules · « **Reply #17 on:** November 10, 2006, 04:46:09 PM »

Quote from: puddin on November 10, 2006, 04:40:56 PM

The finale will have the final 5 instead of the usual 3 or 4. spec is there very well could be a final 3 for the million$$ YAY! !

Ok, that's what I recall reading, just don't remember where. So the F3 would EACH get a million or F1 gets 1mil & the other two each 1/2 Mil? (if the specs are correct)

Jeffrey Scott · « **Reply #18 on:** November 10, 2006, 04:47:56 PM »

I thought it meant the finale would have final 5, then they would be cut down to three and the jury would have to vote on those three to give the money two. That way they could have a jury of 10 and still not have a tie.

Rob · « **Reply #19 on:** November 10, 2006, 05:14:21 PM »

But if there was a Final 3, that means that only 9 will be on the Jury, so there is still the potential for a tie.

Before Brad was voted off last night, there was 12 people!! Still can tie with final 3

Rob

puddin · « **Reply #20 on:** November 10, 2006, 05:30:45 PM »

Ahh Rob is right. Now I remember a spoiler that said the jury would be 10

.

Vintage212 · « **Reply #21 on:** November 11, 2006, 12:01:56 AM »

What would happen if there was a tie? Would they just split it? I mean...I guess the challenge portion of the game is over by then.

TannerB · « **Reply #22 on:** November 11, 2006, 12:20:45 AM »

I asked the same thing. Maybe America would decide

RudyRules · « **Reply #23 on:** November 11, 2006, 12:56:17 AM »

Great idea, TannerB!

If there's a tie, why not let America decide! This is a season of twists & new stuff , so America voting would be appropriate!

x_kicks · « **Reply #24 on:** November 11, 2006, 02:58:42 AM »

Quote from: RudyRules on November 11, 2006, 12:56:17 AM

Great idea, TannerB! If there's a tie, why not let America decide! This is a season of twists & new stuff , so America voting would be appropriate!

If America gets to vote, won't Burnett be like choosing the winner, since editing influences how we see each contestant?

TheCinera · « **Reply #25 on:** November 11, 2006, 08:49:29 AM »

Well kicks, we have three people to choose from and America will be sending in the votes. I don't think the editing impacts much of the public's views because the editors have to fit the show into an hour time slot and they need just the best scenes.

So, in brief, Bennet choses who we see, but we will make the ultimate decision.

Vintage212 · « **Reply #26 on:** November 11, 2006, 10:03:15 AM »

Hm...that would be a really cool twist. Now I'm curious to see how it's going to turn out.

RudyRules · « **Reply #27 on:** November 11, 2006, 02:14:49 PM »

What an awesome FIRST for all SURVIVOR fans if WE could FINALLY get to choose the winner!

laterplayer007 · « **Reply #28 on:** November 11, 2006, 02:59:01 PM »

moved to spoilers

Jeffrey Scott · « **Reply #29 on:** November 13, 2006, 09:14:58 AM »

I'm not so comfortable with the idea of us voting for the winner. I like when you never know. There have been Survivor seasons I loved the ending to, and some I have not. It's a crap shoot, but that's what makes it fun.

puddin · « **Reply #30 on:** November 13, 2006, 11:22:32 AM »

How can we vote? The finale and Jeff reading the votes is only 1 hour.

Jeffrey Scott · « **Reply #31 on:** November 13, 2006, 11:48:50 AM »

Yea, that's the other problem.

RudyRules · « **Reply #32 on:** November 13, 2006, 01:54:21 PM »

Couldn't we vote after the Dec 14 show ends and before the Finale begins? (Dec 17)
We voted for Rupert as America's favorite, but maybe the voting time was over a week or so?

Rob · « **Reply #33 on:** November 13, 2006, 02:00:53 PM »

Quote from: RudyRules on November 13, 2006, 01:54:21 PM

Couldn't we vote after the Dec 14 show ends and before the Finale begins? (Dec 17)
We voted for Rupert as America's favorite, but maybe the voting time was over a week or so?

But the Dec 14th show, we will still have 4 or 5 players left, not just 2? Am I right, isn't the final show 2 hours long, and then the 1 hour reunion?

Rob

Jeffrey Scott · « **Reply #34 on:** November 13, 2006, 02:12:55 PM »

Needless to say. America calling in the winner is NOT going to happen. It just wouldn't work. Why mess with it anyway? If they want to have us vote for someone to win a car or money, fine. But not the game.

TheCinera · « **Reply #35 on:** November 13, 2006, 02:59:31 PM »

Yeah, who cares about who we think should win, that's up to the Jury to decide.

News:

Author Topic: SuperSized Jury!! (Read 12849 times)